Dealing with sadness (crow).
Publisher: Faber & Faber
First Published: 24th August 2015
Date Reviewed: 9th November 2016
A family in mourning is visited by a crow. Crow brings some havoc with him but he’s also there as Dad gets through the days without his wife – struggling to finish writing his book on Ted Hughes – and as the boys come to terms with life without their mother.
Grief Is The Thing With Feathers is a rather experimental book steeped in literary history. Looking at grief both as a process and in the various guises it takes, it blends prose and poetry together with semi-autobiographical elements – Porter lost his father as a child – to become something very unusual indeed.
There is a lot to this book; it’s difficult to know where to begin. Let’s start with the style: Porter opts to eschew convention, deciding not to choose between poetry, prose, fiction, non-fiction, commentary, study, fully-fledged plot, vignette. His book is the result of a vast mixing pot that is both confusing and compelling. Mind-blowing concepts within the whole compete alongside aspects that are difficult to define. It’s safe to say this book requires a lot of attention.
And a fair bit of knowledge. Whilst the book can just about be read without knowledge of its background subjects, your reading of it will be immensely improved by your having at least a basic idea of the lives and work of those who have influenced Porter. Chief amongst these is the poet Ted Hughes, whose book Crow: From the Life and Songs of the Crow is, not surprisingly, a major factor. Porter’s general interest in Hughes means that any knowledge is useful – and it pays to know about the poet’s relationship with Sylvia Plath.
Porter takes his inspiration for his Crow from Hughes but also from the bird itself. It is the sections written from Crow’s point of view that invite the most bafflement – the sentences are often a mess of words, onomatopoeia-like creations, and a general strangeness pervades. There is the idea of a metaphor – who or what Crow is, and how much he/she/it is related to Hughes’ Crow is a question that spans the entire book. Is this Death? Is this grief itself? Is it, even, Sylvia Plath? And why does Dad see Crow – because it suits Porter or because he’s working on a Hughes commentary?
On the stylistic note, the book uses three narratives – Crow, Dad, and ‘Boys’, the latter of which concerns the two sons but is written from one point of view, potentially to infer that at their young age the boys’ grief could be considered interchangeable, or maybe that their experiences are the same. Sections by the Boys are written in verse and meanings are split over a couple of lines. Much whitespace between narratives as well as lines and sometimes words mean that the book is even shorter than it appears, physically. And in many ways this is a good thing because of the amount of detail and commentary Porter has packed in.
To the stated grief, then; Porter has spared nothing. The book is at its most powerful when it’s examining the forms grief takes and how different people deal with it. Again metaphors and explorations take centre stage, with stereotypes and the idea that one must get over it always lingering nearby.
Take this, the Boys’ reaction to their father calmly coming into their room to tell them their mother has gone:
Where are the fire engines? Where is the
noise and clamour of an event like this?
Where are the strangers going out of their
way to help, screaming, flinging bits of
emergency, glow-in-the-dark equipment
at us to try and settle us and save us?
And this, wherein Dad works through both the metaphorical and literal detritus left in her wake:
She won’t ever use (make-up, turmeric, hairbrush, thesaurus).
She will never finish (Patricia Highsmith novel, peanut butter, lip balm).
And I will never shop for green Virago Classics for her birthday.
I will stop finding her hairs.
I will stop hearing her breathing.
As said, this book requires all your attention. It’s incredibly easy, even with context behind you, to lose your way and it can take work to find yourself again. This is where Porter’s leaving of titbits comes in handy, most noticeably around the middle where comprehension questions, of the English Literature lesson type, are added as part of the narrative.
So Grief Is The Thing With Feathers is hard work but can be very rewarding. But it is also a very unusual beast and fits a specific, niche, category. You have to be happy with the very experimental style.
A difficult book to recommend outright, Porter’s début will intrigue most, delight many, and confuse just as many too and your experience of it won’t necessarily lie in how much you do or don’t know of Porter’s literary interests.
Keep a look out for it, go after it even, and see what you think. It’s quite an experience.
This book is shortlisted for the 2016 Young Writer Of The Year Award. I’m on the Shadow Judging Panel.
November 14, 2016, 7:15 pm
I loved Crow’s bits! A lot of shouty, stomping, stream of consciousness (if a crow has consciousness) with a touch of Under Milk Wood to it. I thought that was where the writing really took off but the rest left me a bit cold, and I didn’t feel the father’s grief at all.
November 15, 2016, 3:44 pm
Hmm. Whilst part of me is intrigued by your thoughts on this book, another, smaller, part of me wonders if I’d perhaps find it a little too busy.
November 16, 2016, 4:51 pm
Wonderful review! I quite enjoyed the book, I liked the experimental style of it, it really went well with the subject matter I thought since deep grief often feels so umoored and topsy-turvy.
November 20, 2016, 7:19 pm
I really didn’t get this book, at all, or maybe I read it at the wrong time. In fact, it’s not about getting it, because I enjoyed what it said about grief, it’s more that I didn’t care, which is probably worse. I found it irritating rather than interesting. Which is a shame. I don’t think it was the book’s fault, it just clashed with me.
November 23, 2016, 7:46 pm
Mary: Yes, they were quite interesting if understandably all over the place. Under Milk Wood is one I’ve seen mentioned in reference to Porter; might have to look into it further. Regarding the father – the writing style?
Tracy: It is quite busy – that’s not a bad word for it, actually – but kind of understandably so if that makes sense. Worth a look at.
Stefanie: It did indeed, I have to agree. And as much as Crow was all over the place, for me at least, it fit well.
Alice: I can understand that. It’s a very particular book; I think if you liked what it said about grief then you did get quite a bit/a lot of it :)